Pi number

C.B.

Hush
Ok, now the break down...

Hush

Well HRBoT (Harry leaR Shit-for-Brains),

Again just nonsense spewing out of your brainwashed mind, and so, it shouldn't be surprising to anyone why you are unable to convince anyone intelligent your PI = 3.1446 horseshit is valid.

C.B.

Hush

Time for you pills now, paps

Hush

Thank you HRBoT (Harry leaR Shit-for-Brains),

for the concern, but I cannot accept your generous offer, you'll need those pills for your headache from having bashed your thick-skull into your walls (LOL).

C.B.

Hush
Thanks for displaying again such a beautiful and simple derivation of π3.1446

Hush

Oh HRBoT (Harry leaR Shit-for-Brains),

No need to thank me but you are most welcome all the same, and its only because you earned the prestigious Lear Unwise Prize award for your Pi = 3.1446 horseshit few-lines of effort. Again, congratulations, and suggest you take the award with you when you go show a math teacher your amazing "B"ee's Pi = 3.1446 horseshit proof, I mean you worked for it - all six lines of it that you stole from someone else - not even your original idea, but hey, you're lying bag-of-shit, its what you do best.

C.B.

Hush

Keep going Jimmy. One glimpse after the other and, who knows, may be you get it once.

Hush

HRBoT (Harry leaR Shit-for-Brains),

You must be quite proud of yourself, you've actually convinced yourself your "B"ee's Pi = 3.1446 horseshit is valid, well isn't that special and do you recall, not that long ago, you were just as arrogant with another Pi = 3.1446 horseshit proof. Never changes with you, you never get smarter, nor wiser, just more stubborn, arrogant, and foolish. I guess, just like before when you idiotically claimed you had proven Billy wrong, with your last fake Pi = 3.1446 horseshit, so are you again now claiming to have proven Billy wrong with your latest "B"ee's Pi = 3.1446 horseshit proof?

C.B.

Hush Never changes with you, you never get smarter, nor wiser, just more stubborn, arrogant, and foolish.

but it is changing with you, Jimmy. don’t lose hope.

Hush

My delusional HRBoT (Harry leaR Shit for Brains),

You are a sad all alone dipshit promoting your "B"ee's Pi = 3.1446 horseshit proof. I mean why can't you rally all your Pi-Radical dipshit friends to back you up. Haven't seen a single Pi-Radical buddy of your support your "B"ee's Pi = 3.1446 horseshit which proves, you're the only one who believes in your own horseshit. Yup, have to admit, you're a goddam expert in how to play pretend, pretending your Pi = 3.1446 horseshit is valid, pretend that you're smart, pretend you're an expert in mathematics with a grade school math education, pretend that you're smarter than Billy, pretend that you're smarter than all mathematicians in the world, yup you're a goddam expert in playing pretend, and so now why don't you go run along and do something useful instead posting your bullshit in this Billy Meier forum. The clock is ticking shit-for-brains HRBoT, only 4-years left to change the world. What are you going to do? Hide in your shell I suppose is all you're good at, meaning posting more of your shit in a Billy Meier forum - what a dipshit.

Jude Andre Charles

Hush have you looked at Mark Wollum's proof?

C.B.

Jude Andre Charles
Long ago. I don’t remember what he exactly did.

Jude Andre Charles

C.B. he has something called the conspiracy of Pi where he goes in great length explaining why 3.14159265359 is wrong. I'll look up the link for you.

C.B.

Jude Andre Charles

Ok. Thanks.

Jude Andre Charles

C.B. THE GREAT PI CONSPIRACY

C.B.

Jude Andre Charles
Fine. But we need the diagrams.
Wollum did quite a chunk of a derivation and without the diagrams we’re in disadvantage to understand what he did.
Could be I have a copy with the diagrams, I’ll look it up.

Jude Andre Charles

Focus On Pi - 3.144606

C.B.

Always the same problem, inserting φ in the calculation. Of course you get π related to φ, simply because you’re relating it intentionally. This is no proof at all.
And, I believe to recall Wollum making the same mistake: taking two triangles and supposing them to be Kepler Triangles. Something he can’t prove beforehand and would be needed to consider those triangles in fact Kepler Triangles. He is just guessing and this, again, is not a mathematical proof.
Do you get the point?

Jude Andre Charles

C.B. just a quick question:

Through your formula you found 3.144606, right?

What then is 4 divided by 3.144606? And when you square the answer what do you get?

I want your insight into this please.

C.B.

Jude Andre Charles

√φ=1.2720…..

(√φ)²=φ

« Previous Page