Pi number
ChatGPT is not infallible. It was made by humans. If it was made directly out of the depths of the Universe, it would be another story.
Most of what's here is self-explanatory for the ones who have eyes to see.
Hm, seeing the pictures is nice. Can you put this into words please?
Hi Dirko!
While you wait fir the answer, would you like to have a peep on the following derivation of the π value and say if you find a mistake there?
The non Transcendental and Exact Value of π:
Lets take a circle of Diameter 1 and perimeter π
now take a Square with the same perimeter and Side b=π/4
Set up
4b=π
Calculate the areas:
Square:
As=b2
Circle:
(using 4b as π)
Ac= 4br2
Ac=4b(1/4)
Ac=b
Use b and b2 as the legs of a right triangle of Hypotenuse = 1
We use Hypotenuse= 1 to keep the nominal values of b.
With a Hypotenuse ≠ 1, b is no longer =π/4
b4+b2-1=0
b=0.7861513
and π
4b= 3.1446052
Dirko I took the advice of C.B. and devised a way to compare the values of Pi using quadratic equations, while at the same time I used the squaring of the circle to demonstrate the relationship between Pi and Phi.
In the past years, there was a video on YouTube by Samuel Laboy, ing., that showed how to square the circle. It has since then been removed, which is unfortunate because the video in and of itself was priceless.
However, Samuel Laboy himself did not know that by doing the configuration he had demonstrated that it would geometrically reveal 3.144606 in the construction via the Pythagorean Theorem.
I tried the construction as per the instructions of Laboy, then traced a line from top to center the radius of the circle, to which the length came up as 1.27202, then traced another line from center to left (or right) to which the length came up as 1, which is half one side of the square.
With the Pythagorean Theorem, a perfect Tycho Brahe's Right Triangle (formely Kepler's) with Phi 1.618034 as the hypotenuse.
4 times half the length of square divided by the radius gives off Pi 3.144606 to 100% ACCURACY AS A CONSTANT... UNCHANGING.
Jude Andre Charles I took the advice of C.B. and devised a way to compare the values of Pi using quadratic equations, while at the same time I used the squaring of the circle to demonstrate the relationship between Pi and Phi.
I disent Jude.
I didn’t advice you to do anything like that but to understand how the Pythagoras theorem solves the question of the π value in my derivation.
C.B. so... You didn't tell me to understand b2+b-1? You should not discredit yourself like this.
To understand b4+b2-1 which is not an advice to devise a way to compare the values of π, as one could understand from your comment.
First off, here is the oddly placed pi calculation picture in CR 260 https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_260:
Strange aye? If you scroll to the approximate middle of the document, there it is. Odd.
I say oddly placed because it is in a different part of the conversation flow.
Thank you Jude for explaining this! It's been soooo long (30 years) since I had taken maths classes calculus, diff equations etc but that part in my brain sadly withered away being unused. Now I get what you were demonstrating though. It may help others more proficient to wrap their minds around it and perhaps spark further investigation.
Well my Pi-Radical buddies,
They say small things amuse small minds, exemplified right here in this Billy Meier Pi discussion forum, intended to discuss Billy Meier's information about Pi, but has become a rat's nest infected with Pi-Radicals having fun playing pretend mathematics, showing each other's great-big fake Pi = 3.1446 horseshit proofs, all though some fake Pi = 3.1446 horseshit proofs are pretty tiny like HRBoT's (Harry leaR Shit-for-Brains) latest "B"ee's Pi = 3.1446 horseshit proof is only a few lines long, thanks to his amazing, illogical and ridiculous assumptions, but when playing pretend mathematics, there are no rules.
Now Jude.bug, don't get in the way of HRBoT's criticizing his own behavior, and just leave him be, and allow him to discredit himself, its ok, HRBoT, by definition, a discredit to himself and everyone else (LOL). Jude.bug, taking HRBoT's advice to use quadratic equations to solve for Pi is a fool's errand, for one, he's a lying bag-of-shit, and two, you need to learn to think for yourself and stop being his puppet.
Oh and Dirko, thanks for showing your true colors as another Pi-Radical pushing the Pi = 3.1446 horseshit; you had me fooled there for a minute as a normal person but you're just another clueless foolishly claims the value for traditional Pi = 3.14159 isn't good enough to calculate the exact location of Apophis, while having little to no knowledge in mathematics, which only proves, you're like a monkey, monkey see, monkey do meaning you're just repeating what that dipshit Harry Lear's is saying instead of trusting Billy Meier's information about Pi.
Its interesting how you Pi-Radical dipshits, when you refer to Billy Meier's information about Pi, which is very rarely, you only present the information in the Contact Reports that vaguely supports your Pi = 3.1446 horseshit agenda like in CR 836. CR 836, wasn't anything Billy Meier or the Plejaren had written or stated. That section you copy/pasted was written by another Earthly bound Pi-Radical dipshit moron who foolishly believes the Pi = 3.1446 horseshit and even quotes Harry Lear. Ever notice the Plejaren nor Billy Meier NEVER directly mention Harry Lear; that's because he's not worth mentioning because he's a dipshit.
The Plejaren's response to Oleg's writeup was polite at best, nothing more and they avoided any specific comment on ANY details Oleg had presented so you can't really infer anything, and at best, speculate whatever you want, it means nothing. The real meat and potatoes in Billy's CR's about Pi, which you Pi-Radicals cleverly avoid, is in CR 712, where Ptaah states that traditional Pi = 3.14159 is VALID for all circular and round computations in both math and physics and Pi = 3.14159 is also confirmed valid by 20,080,000 academics on Earth, each one accredited in mathematics. Basically, if you had any brains, you'd realize you will never convince anyone in the world, who is intelligent, accredited in mathematics, that your Pi = 3.1446 horseshit is valid. It will never happen, so you knuckleheads can keep playing pretend mathematics trying to prove Pi = 3.1446 is a fool's errand. HRBoT has been trying to credibly prove Pi = 3.1446 for going on 8-years now and look where its gotten him to, nowhere! - except posting his Pi = 3.1446 horseshit in a Billy Meier discussion forum because no one else in the world will listen to his nonsense.
Also consider Billy in CR 251, states the true error in Pi will be solved by Earth's brilliant scientists who work frantically together to save our dying Sun. Our Sun is NOT dying anytime soon to the extent that Earth's scientist will be frantically driven to try and save it, so when Apophis arrives, guarantee Earth scientists will still be using traditional Pi = 3.14159 which is a damn good thing, because if they were using Harry-the-dipshit-Lear's Pi = 3.1446 horseshit, we'd all be doomed (LOL). Its amazing how all you Pi-Radical dipshits just crawl out of the woodwork like rats fleeing a dying Pi = 3.1446 ship. Meaning you will never ever successfully prove Pi = 3.1446 because its physically impossible but you are all just too goddam stupid and stubborn to realize this very simple truth.
Dirko this is for today. The blue line is Earth's orbit.
And this for 2029... Notice how close to Earth's orbit Apophis will be? But that is based on the 3.14159.
Wow that is cool! And Friday the 13th no less for 2029 [cue ominous music]. Don't you wish we could render this in a VR setting, zoom in, rotate view, change variables etc and play what-if?
The prediction is that if/when it hits it will tear up Europe from the North Sea to the Baltic Sea, Netherlands to Bulgaria/Romania.
So if we can't calculate this properly before 2029 or 2036 then it will hit. Based on the predictions we should stop trying because it's useless?
Dirko that's why we also need to pursue the Creation-Energy teaching in depth.