For the expansion/contraction after the big bang of our universe there are 2 numbers to begin with :
- half-life rate : 6,347,755,102,040 years
- initial speed of light : 44,069,497.500 km/s
At each step (called an hyperspace or a period) the half life number is added and the speed of light is divided by 2 :
Our actual speed of light is : 299,792.458 km/s.
Almost, we don't have a very precise number, What is the speed of light NOW to the nearest nanosecond and micrometre/s ? We don't know.
Because we do not have the technology to do so and we consider it to be a constant, which is not the case.
Acutually the speed of light decreases annually by 27.119 µm/s
We can therefore calculate the age of our universe.
So we are at the 7th hyperspace : 44,434,285,714,280 years and 344,292.949 km/s
Which gives :
factor for speed = 6,347,755,102,040 * 2 / 344,292.949 = 36,874,151.04
diff speed = 344,292.949 - 299,792.458 = 44,500.491
years = diff speed * factor for speed + 44,434,285,714,280 = 46,075,203,540,851.79
The age of our universe : 46.075 trillion years
So we have the total expansion / contraction of : 311,040,000,000,000 years
This is called a great time or a creation day (311 trillion years).
Material and spiritual form created only in the first expansion. 311/2 during 155 trillion years.
The material belt of the creation renew itself every 49 billion years.
In the course of the last 3 billion years of the transitionless renewal of the material belt it occurs that all life forms reach their highest stage of development and their spirit-forms go on into higher spirit levels.
Creation evolution step
Prior to the big bang : 3 birth phases of 3 great times each.Sleep Wake Sleep
So we have these 3 first evolution creation step in this chart.
This goes to 10^49. The total of years being 7^(10^49). 1 and 10^50 zeroes.
At this stage it enter to the absolute absolutum.
7 BEING-Absolutum
6 Sohar-Absolutum
5 Super-Absolutum
4 Creations-Absolutum
3 Central-Absolutum
2 Ur-Absolutum
1 Absolute Absolutum.
The Absolute Absolutum is the one Absolutum-form that created the very first and lowest Creation-forms, the very first material universes, which evolved up to the first Ur-Creations which on their turn created new material-universe Creations.
The other six (6) Absolutum-forms do not create universes / creations.
Number of creations that have already reached the absolute absolutum until the creation of our universe 46 trillion years ago is 7.3 10^701392 = 1 Zahlanon
All creations float in a void (nihilo). Matter being a palpable idea, a solid form of energy, that is palpable (idea-> energy-> matter), where did the initial idea come from, the first form of energy that created the BEIN-Absolutum? We have no way of knowing, because it is impossible to understand what does not exist. (Nihilo)
There is a discussion about this with Billy here.
References :
What is the Creation
Contact 119
Chronons time travel
Cycles of the Material Belt and Universes Within the Creation
How did our universe and our world come into existence ?
Zahlanon, Time anon
Videos:
The Creation - How It All Began
The Evolution of the Creation
The Seven Belts of the Creation
Number of creations
The Creation
The Creation
Last edited by Arthur on Wed Nov 12, 2025 5:27 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: The Creation
The speed of light in the Seventeenth General Conference on Weights and Measures (October 1983) to maintain unchanged the value of the speed of light recommended in 1975 by the Fifteenth General Conference on Weights and Measures in its Resolution 2, c = 299,792,458 m/s
In fact, it is an accepted weighted average value, determined from three measurements :
Translated (p 68 15th CGPM) :
Considering, on the other hand, the needs in the fields of astronomy, geodesy, and geophysics, the C.C.D.M. decided to recommend a value for c.
The three recent measurements leading to precise values for the speed of light in a vacuum and discussed by the C.C.D.M. are:
1° The measurement of the frequency of the methane-tuned laser with its wavelength value already recommended, which gives
c = (299,792,458.3 +/- 1.2) m/s
2° The measurement of the frequency of the R(12) line of carbon dioxide with its wavelength determined, which gives
c = (299,792,457 +/- 6) m/s
3° Bay el Luther's measurement, which uses microwave modulation of the visible radiation of a helium-neon laser and gives
c = (299,792,462 +/- 18) m/s
Due to the significant difference in uncertainties, which are 4.10^9, 2.10^-8 and 6 x 10^8 in relative terms, only the first of the three results is important for determining the weighted average value, which is
c = 299,792,458 m/s
Resolution 10 of the 15th CGPM (1975) see p 68
Resolution 1 of the 17th CGPM (1983) see p 14
In fact, it is an accepted weighted average value, determined from three measurements :
Translated (p 68 15th CGPM) :
Considering, on the other hand, the needs in the fields of astronomy, geodesy, and geophysics, the C.C.D.M. decided to recommend a value for c.
The three recent measurements leading to precise values for the speed of light in a vacuum and discussed by the C.C.D.M. are:
1° The measurement of the frequency of the methane-tuned laser with its wavelength value already recommended, which gives
c = (299,792,458.3 +/- 1.2) m/s
2° The measurement of the frequency of the R(12) line of carbon dioxide with its wavelength determined, which gives
c = (299,792,457 +/- 6) m/s
3° Bay el Luther's measurement, which uses microwave modulation of the visible radiation of a helium-neon laser and gives
c = (299,792,462 +/- 18) m/s
Due to the significant difference in uncertainties, which are 4.10^9, 2.10^-8 and 6 x 10^8 in relative terms, only the first of the three results is important for determining the weighted average value, which is
c = 299,792,458 m/s
Resolution 10 of the 15th CGPM (1975) see p 68
Resolution 1 of the 17th CGPM (1983) see p 14
Re: The Creation
As we know according to the Seventeenth General Conference on Weights and Measures (October 1983) the meter is the length of the path traveled by light in a vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second.
One second as defined by Billy Meier :
One second equals the time light needs to travel 299'792,5 km in space.
Time itself consists of chronons, which is why the smallest unit of time is called a chronon. The number of chronons determines the second, where the chronons are related to present time. If these flow, by the expiry of time, into the past, then they become Tachyons, which will maintain the previous chronon speed, even when time has changed through the steady deceleration of the light constant.
The chronon has a wavelength or wave distance of 105 septillionth of 140 millimeters. (λ 14700 x 10 ^-24 mm, f= 20,39404762 x 10 ^ 30 hertz). Now, should the time of one second be measured, it is simply necessary to form a fixed flow point at which it is measured, how many chronons by this measurable point are passing through in the area from the beginning to the end of a beam of light of a certain length.
The number of chronons passing through gives, on one hand the speed of the second, on the other hand however, the distance as well. So if then for example from the beginning to the end of a light beam of 299’792.5 kilometres 20,39404762 x 10^30 (Nonillion) chronons passes through the measuring point then it gives the speed of a second with a passage distance of the light of 299’792,5 kilometers. This corresponds quite exactly to the current light second in kilometre, as well as one second as a small time unit of one earth day.
--
So for the speed of light 299,792,458 m/s the frequency and the wave length of the chronons being 14.7 yoctometer, 14.7ym, the chronon frequency is 20.39404476190476 10^30 Hz (Quetta Hz)
According to the spreadsheet i made in the 1st post of this topic we see the spped of light is falling (not so much because it is 27µm/s per year, The speed of light will decrease by 1% in 110.55 billion years).
Billy says :
"Every dwindling away of a half-life thus creates its own hyperspace, whereby seven different hyperspaces or half life hyper spaces already exist in our universe which are further divided into countless more normal hyperspaces which have originated through the decline of the STEADILY FALLING light speed.” See the 1st spreadsheet."
There is therefore a direct relationship between the speed of light and chronons, via the wavelength of chronons.
The speed of light decreasing, the chronons frequency decreasing too.
Billy says :
"If for example tachyons, with a higher light speed than of those in normal space and the present of the material universe in any given hyperspace, is stored around a flying object, it is automatically flung into the past, while a chronon flow below our present speed of light results in a trip to the future."
So we can calculated the frequency needed for a travel to 1000 years in the past (year 1025) :
Speed of light in years 1025 :
We calculated before the age of our universe , the numbers of years : 46,075,203,540,851.79
substract 1000 years : 46,075,203,539,851.79
The speed of light start for this hyperspace (the 7th) according to the spreadsheet: 344,292,949 m/s
The corresponding year: 44,434,285,714,280
2 time half life time period : 6,347,755,102,040 * 2 = 12,695,510,204,080
factor for year = 344,292,949 / 12,695,510,204,080 = 2.71192684236789e-05
46,075,203,539,851.79 - 44,434,285,714,280 = 1,640,917,825,571.789
1,640,917,825,571.789 * 2.71192684236789e-05 = 44,500,490.97288086
44,500,490.97288086 - 344,292,949 = 299,792,458.02711916
The speed of light 1000 years ago was 299792458.02711916
The chronons frequency was 299,792,458.02711916 / 14.7e-24 = 20.394044763749603 10^30 Hz
By storing around the ship the chronons at 20.394044763749603 Quetta Hz we go to the past 1000 years.
We can therefore see that we need to be very precise when it comes to the speed of light.
The current value is a weighted average dating back to 1975.
So, if we are to travel to the past or future in 1 or 2 days, the speed of light must be very very precise and accurate.
Time travel
Contact 119
I wrote an application with data on the genesis and numerous values for the speed of light and the frequency of chronons as a function of time (one year ago, in 10 years, the differences, etc.). I use the MPFR library because the standard 64 bits are not sufficient and give false results.
My application uses May 27, 1975, 13:00:00 UTC as the reference date for the speed of light value of 299,792,458 m/s.This is the date of the official publication of the value of the speed of light (as a weighted average of three measurements, as we saw above).
Consequently :
From a date we have the speed of light.
From a speed of light we have the date.
Chronon frequency = Speed of light / wave length of the chronon. (14.7 ym (yocto meter))
From a date we have the chronon frequency.
From the chronon frequency we have a date.
So by surrounding the ship with chronons at the desired frequency, we can travel to the past or the future at a specific date.
One second as defined by Billy Meier :
One second equals the time light needs to travel 299'792,5 km in space.
Time itself consists of chronons, which is why the smallest unit of time is called a chronon. The number of chronons determines the second, where the chronons are related to present time. If these flow, by the expiry of time, into the past, then they become Tachyons, which will maintain the previous chronon speed, even when time has changed through the steady deceleration of the light constant.
The chronon has a wavelength or wave distance of 105 septillionth of 140 millimeters. (λ 14700 x 10 ^-24 mm, f= 20,39404762 x 10 ^ 30 hertz). Now, should the time of one second be measured, it is simply necessary to form a fixed flow point at which it is measured, how many chronons by this measurable point are passing through in the area from the beginning to the end of a beam of light of a certain length.
The number of chronons passing through gives, on one hand the speed of the second, on the other hand however, the distance as well. So if then for example from the beginning to the end of a light beam of 299’792.5 kilometres 20,39404762 x 10^30 (Nonillion) chronons passes through the measuring point then it gives the speed of a second with a passage distance of the light of 299’792,5 kilometers. This corresponds quite exactly to the current light second in kilometre, as well as one second as a small time unit of one earth day.
--
So for the speed of light 299,792,458 m/s the frequency and the wave length of the chronons being 14.7 yoctometer, 14.7ym, the chronon frequency is 20.39404476190476 10^30 Hz (Quetta Hz)
According to the spreadsheet i made in the 1st post of this topic we see the spped of light is falling (not so much because it is 27µm/s per year, The speed of light will decrease by 1% in 110.55 billion years).
Billy says :
"Every dwindling away of a half-life thus creates its own hyperspace, whereby seven different hyperspaces or half life hyper spaces already exist in our universe which are further divided into countless more normal hyperspaces which have originated through the decline of the STEADILY FALLING light speed.” See the 1st spreadsheet."
There is therefore a direct relationship between the speed of light and chronons, via the wavelength of chronons.
The speed of light decreasing, the chronons frequency decreasing too.
Billy says :
"If for example tachyons, with a higher light speed than of those in normal space and the present of the material universe in any given hyperspace, is stored around a flying object, it is automatically flung into the past, while a chronon flow below our present speed of light results in a trip to the future."
So we can calculated the frequency needed for a travel to 1000 years in the past (year 1025) :
Speed of light in years 1025 :
We calculated before the age of our universe , the numbers of years : 46,075,203,540,851.79
substract 1000 years : 46,075,203,539,851.79
The speed of light start for this hyperspace (the 7th) according to the spreadsheet: 344,292,949 m/s
The corresponding year: 44,434,285,714,280
2 time half life time period : 6,347,755,102,040 * 2 = 12,695,510,204,080
factor for year = 344,292,949 / 12,695,510,204,080 = 2.71192684236789e-05
46,075,203,539,851.79 - 44,434,285,714,280 = 1,640,917,825,571.789
1,640,917,825,571.789 * 2.71192684236789e-05 = 44,500,490.97288086
44,500,490.97288086 - 344,292,949 = 299,792,458.02711916
The speed of light 1000 years ago was 299792458.02711916
The chronons frequency was 299,792,458.02711916 / 14.7e-24 = 20.394044763749603 10^30 Hz
By storing around the ship the chronons at 20.394044763749603 Quetta Hz we go to the past 1000 years.
We can therefore see that we need to be very precise when it comes to the speed of light.
The current value is a weighted average dating back to 1975.
So, if we are to travel to the past or future in 1 or 2 days, the speed of light must be very very precise and accurate.
Time travel
Contact 119
I wrote an application with data on the genesis and numerous values for the speed of light and the frequency of chronons as a function of time (one year ago, in 10 years, the differences, etc.). I use the MPFR library because the standard 64 bits are not sufficient and give false results.
My application uses May 27, 1975, 13:00:00 UTC as the reference date for the speed of light value of 299,792,458 m/s.This is the date of the official publication of the value of the speed of light (as a weighted average of three measurements, as we saw above).
Consequently :
From a date we have the speed of light.
From a speed of light we have the date.
Chronon frequency = Speed of light / wave length of the chronon. (14.7 ym (yocto meter))
From a date we have the chronon frequency.
From the chronon frequency we have a date.
So by surrounding the ship with chronons at the desired frequency, we can travel to the past or the future at a specific date.
Last edited by Arthur on Sun Sep 07, 2025 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The Creation
More accurate calculation of the relationship between the number of years and the speed of light.
The relationship between the number of years and the speed of light is made from the table on the top of the 1st post.
The calculation i made before is linear.
The initial speed of light is divided by a power of 2 which is an exponential interpolation, not linear.
We can have a more precise result if we use an exponential interpolation.
We have to calculate the exponent value for the speed of light and apply it to the number of years.
Number of years at the reference date which is for the speed of light 299,792.458 km/s as of May 27, 1975 as we saw earlier.
factor for speed = initial speed of light / reference speed of light
exponent = log2(factor for speed)
factor for speed = 44,069,497.5 / 299,792.458 = 147.00002059424725
exponent = log2(147.00002059424725) = 7.199672546953482
So we multiply this exponent with the half life period.
Number of years = 6,347,755,102,040 * 7.199672546953482 = 45,701,758,142,941.29 years
So we see a difference with the linear only calculation in my previous post.
46,075,203,540,851.79 - 45,701,758,142,941.29 = 373,445,397,910.5 years
So 373 billion years !
With the standard calculator i use on my computer, we only have two decimal places.
With a MPFR : Multiple Precision Floating-Point Reliable Library we can have many more decimal places.
45,701,758,142,941.28645562066809932933 years
To get the speed of light from the numbers of years, we must therefore perform the inverse calculation :
exponent = Number of years / half life period
speed of light = initial speed of light / 2^exponent
exponent = 45,701,758,142,941.29 / 6,347,755,102,040 = 7.199672546953482
speed of light = 44,069,497.500 / 2^ 7.199672546953482 = 299,792.458 km/s
The chronons frequency at this reference date (our known speed of light) is :
as a reminder : frequency = speed / wave length
frequency = 299,792,458 / 1.47 *10^-23
frequency = 20,394,044,761,904,763,588,225,306,322,783.65413928052943091464 hertz
20.39 Quetta Hz
The relationship between the number of years and the speed of light is made from the table on the top of the 1st post.
The calculation i made before is linear.
The initial speed of light is divided by a power of 2 which is an exponential interpolation, not linear.
We can have a more precise result if we use an exponential interpolation.
We have to calculate the exponent value for the speed of light and apply it to the number of years.
Number of years at the reference date which is for the speed of light 299,792.458 km/s as of May 27, 1975 as we saw earlier.
factor for speed = initial speed of light / reference speed of light
exponent = log2(factor for speed)
factor for speed = 44,069,497.5 / 299,792.458 = 147.00002059424725
exponent = log2(147.00002059424725) = 7.199672546953482
So we multiply this exponent with the half life period.
Number of years = 6,347,755,102,040 * 7.199672546953482 = 45,701,758,142,941.29 years
So we see a difference with the linear only calculation in my previous post.
46,075,203,540,851.79 - 45,701,758,142,941.29 = 373,445,397,910.5 years
So 373 billion years !
With the standard calculator i use on my computer, we only have two decimal places.
With a MPFR : Multiple Precision Floating-Point Reliable Library we can have many more decimal places.
45,701,758,142,941.28645562066809932933 years
To get the speed of light from the numbers of years, we must therefore perform the inverse calculation :
exponent = Number of years / half life period
speed of light = initial speed of light / 2^exponent
exponent = 45,701,758,142,941.29 / 6,347,755,102,040 = 7.199672546953482
speed of light = 44,069,497.500 / 2^ 7.199672546953482 = 299,792.458 km/s
The chronons frequency at this reference date (our known speed of light) is :
as a reminder : frequency = speed / wave length
frequency = 299,792,458 / 1.47 *10^-23
frequency = 20,394,044,761,904,763,588,225,306,322,783.65413928052943091464 hertz
20.39 Quetta Hz
Re: The Creation
Contact 134 :
Billy:
...Do you know what really happened in the Big Bang? I mean about whether or not all building blocks already existed in the tiny energy flea from which the original explosion of the Universe, i.e. the Creation, arose? Or is it possible that all elements formed only after the Big Bang? How many elements, i.e. basic building blocks, were concentrated and where? And is the Creation-energy and, thus, the spirit-energy also arranged at the nuclear levels?
Ptaah:
171. That is not just one question, my friend.
172. But listen:
173. Even the spirit-energy resp. Creation-energy, consists of 7 nuclear levels which are of a fine material type, while the 7 nuclear levels of the actual atom's coarse material form reach down into the first fine material level that is half material, half fine-material.
174. In the material, as is the case with the spiritual-energetic, i.e. Creation-energetic level, these more fine nuclear levels under the actual uppermost nuclear levels are called subatomic levels by us.
175. There are 280 raw materials, or basic elements, and these were already contained in the tiny original core from which the big bang developed.
176. The elements did not form only after the explosion but were already existent before in the tiny core which we call Energy-Fetchen.[1]
177. To repeat:
178. As you understand absolutely correctly, the basic building blocks of original material consisting of 280 elements, which were the basis for all later matter and today's Universe, were included in the Energy-Fetchen, which was the original core of all that exists in today's Universe and all its dimensions.
179. Of course, all of the fine material elements were also equally included in the original core, i.e. the Energy-Fetchen.
180. The original generation of the Universe resulted from an idea of the original Creation which created the original core, just a flea-sized product full of energy that was created out of a consciousness form by itself and that accumulated its energy and evolved in strength.
181. In the balance of the accumulation of energy and strength, there originated all 280 basic elements and, with these, the Energy-Fetchen, in which an immense pressure and a temperature of millions of degrees developed, causing the original explosion of the Universe – the Big Bang, as this process is called by you.
Contact 349 :
Billy:
Yes, I know. But unfortunately it cannot be changed, because the 'scribes' have a different opinion. Now I have another question concerning the subatomic levels, of which there are seven in all, as far as I know. Can you give me the names of them?
Ptaah:
58. I would have to change the terms from our language to yours, because our terms would not help you.
Billy:
Of course.
Ptaah:
59. Good.
60. For your understanding, I will first give you our names of the different levels, which I will translate literally into the German language, so that I can attach to each term the meaning according to your language in relation to the subatomic and sub-subatomic levels.
61. The seven levels which are called Ralin in our language are called Kadanralin (Subatomic), Surinralin (Supersubatomic), Nanirralin (Nanatomic), Naniaralin (Subnanatomic), Liknanralin (Supernanatomic), Delralin (Molatomic) and Glanralin (Quanatomic).
Contact 70:
Billy:
But now something else; also a question: In the last contact report, I covered up the question and your answer – on advice. The question was how many atoms a molecule contained. Your answer was that the answer to this question, in this form, could lead to misunderstandings, but then you said that a molecule contained 49 atoms. Unfortunately, I could not find the questioner now, so I cannot refine the question for you and do not know what, in actual fact, to ask. Therefore, I would like to ask you now to give me an explanation for your answer, because in the meantime I have been told that the different molecules, of which, I also do not know what they are, have different numbers of atoms. So, my question goes like this: What did you describe with your answer? Which molecule is it that contains 49 atoms?
Semjase:
4. I feared that, but I can give you the answer:
5. The molecule I have mentioned is, according to your concept, the primary or first molecule of the materialising spirit mass or spirit energy.
6. This molecule contains 49 atoms, of which only a few are known to earthly science.
7. Fundamentally it is to be explained here that the Earth scientists are on the wrong track in the designation of the atoms, because what they designate as under the atoms, are not atoms.
8. These themselves are from a certain level no longer of a purely material nature, but intermediaries between coarse matter and spirit energy.
9. Everything is divided into a sevenness, which we call the sevenness of the matter structure.
10. Structurally the seven levels are completely different and thus also different in their value.
11. So far only two of these levels are known to Earth science, namely the seventh and the sixth, while they begin to explore the fifth, because they have somehow become aware of it.
12. So, the scientists of the Earth work completely correctly in their research, because they explore the origin of life by regression.
13. This means that they trace their research from the end product back to the origin, which corresponds to sound reasoning.
14. Despite their right actions in this respect, however, the Earth scientists are extremely arrogant and still very poorly educated, for how else would it be that they call the seventh (7th) level of matter structure an atom or atomic level, although this designation only applies to the first level, which is absolutely indivisible in its value.
15. The second level known to Earth science, which in reality represents the sixth (6th) level, you call elementary particle or elementary particle level, while the fifth (5th) level is already known to them, but they are not yet able to analyse it.
16. So they know two levels of the matter structure (the two last, sixth and seventh levels), while they try to fathom a third level (i.e. the fifth), which they will call quark or similar, but they have no idea that there are in total seven levels and they still lack the knowledge about the other four.
17. And since these facts are unknown to them, how are they to understand that besides the atomic level there is also a micro-atomic plane which permeates through all spiritual-energetic and coarse-material matter?
Billy:
...Do you know what really happened in the Big Bang? I mean about whether or not all building blocks already existed in the tiny energy flea from which the original explosion of the Universe, i.e. the Creation, arose? Or is it possible that all elements formed only after the Big Bang? How many elements, i.e. basic building blocks, were concentrated and where? And is the Creation-energy and, thus, the spirit-energy also arranged at the nuclear levels?
Ptaah:
171. That is not just one question, my friend.
172. But listen:
173. Even the spirit-energy resp. Creation-energy, consists of 7 nuclear levels which are of a fine material type, while the 7 nuclear levels of the actual atom's coarse material form reach down into the first fine material level that is half material, half fine-material.
174. In the material, as is the case with the spiritual-energetic, i.e. Creation-energetic level, these more fine nuclear levels under the actual uppermost nuclear levels are called subatomic levels by us.
175. There are 280 raw materials, or basic elements, and these were already contained in the tiny original core from which the big bang developed.
176. The elements did not form only after the explosion but were already existent before in the tiny core which we call Energy-Fetchen.[1]
177. To repeat:
178. As you understand absolutely correctly, the basic building blocks of original material consisting of 280 elements, which were the basis for all later matter and today's Universe, were included in the Energy-Fetchen, which was the original core of all that exists in today's Universe and all its dimensions.
179. Of course, all of the fine material elements were also equally included in the original core, i.e. the Energy-Fetchen.
180. The original generation of the Universe resulted from an idea of the original Creation which created the original core, just a flea-sized product full of energy that was created out of a consciousness form by itself and that accumulated its energy and evolved in strength.
181. In the balance of the accumulation of energy and strength, there originated all 280 basic elements and, with these, the Energy-Fetchen, in which an immense pressure and a temperature of millions of degrees developed, causing the original explosion of the Universe – the Big Bang, as this process is called by you.
Contact 349 :
Billy:
Yes, I know. But unfortunately it cannot be changed, because the 'scribes' have a different opinion. Now I have another question concerning the subatomic levels, of which there are seven in all, as far as I know. Can you give me the names of them?
Ptaah:
58. I would have to change the terms from our language to yours, because our terms would not help you.
Billy:
Of course.
Ptaah:
59. Good.
60. For your understanding, I will first give you our names of the different levels, which I will translate literally into the German language, so that I can attach to each term the meaning according to your language in relation to the subatomic and sub-subatomic levels.
61. The seven levels which are called Ralin in our language are called Kadanralin (Subatomic), Surinralin (Supersubatomic), Nanirralin (Nanatomic), Naniaralin (Subnanatomic), Liknanralin (Supernanatomic), Delralin (Molatomic) and Glanralin (Quanatomic).
Contact 70:
Billy:
But now something else; also a question: In the last contact report, I covered up the question and your answer – on advice. The question was how many atoms a molecule contained. Your answer was that the answer to this question, in this form, could lead to misunderstandings, but then you said that a molecule contained 49 atoms. Unfortunately, I could not find the questioner now, so I cannot refine the question for you and do not know what, in actual fact, to ask. Therefore, I would like to ask you now to give me an explanation for your answer, because in the meantime I have been told that the different molecules, of which, I also do not know what they are, have different numbers of atoms. So, my question goes like this: What did you describe with your answer? Which molecule is it that contains 49 atoms?
Semjase:
4. I feared that, but I can give you the answer:
5. The molecule I have mentioned is, according to your concept, the primary or first molecule of the materialising spirit mass or spirit energy.
6. This molecule contains 49 atoms, of which only a few are known to earthly science.
7. Fundamentally it is to be explained here that the Earth scientists are on the wrong track in the designation of the atoms, because what they designate as under the atoms, are not atoms.
8. These themselves are from a certain level no longer of a purely material nature, but intermediaries between coarse matter and spirit energy.
9. Everything is divided into a sevenness, which we call the sevenness of the matter structure.
10. Structurally the seven levels are completely different and thus also different in their value.
11. So far only two of these levels are known to Earth science, namely the seventh and the sixth, while they begin to explore the fifth, because they have somehow become aware of it.
12. So, the scientists of the Earth work completely correctly in their research, because they explore the origin of life by regression.
13. This means that they trace their research from the end product back to the origin, which corresponds to sound reasoning.
14. Despite their right actions in this respect, however, the Earth scientists are extremely arrogant and still very poorly educated, for how else would it be that they call the seventh (7th) level of matter structure an atom or atomic level, although this designation only applies to the first level, which is absolutely indivisible in its value.
15. The second level known to Earth science, which in reality represents the sixth (6th) level, you call elementary particle or elementary particle level, while the fifth (5th) level is already known to them, but they are not yet able to analyse it.
16. So they know two levels of the matter structure (the two last, sixth and seventh levels), while they try to fathom a third level (i.e. the fifth), which they will call quark or similar, but they have no idea that there are in total seven levels and they still lack the knowledge about the other four.
17. And since these facts are unknown to them, how are they to understand that besides the atomic level there is also a micro-atomic plane which permeates through all spiritual-energetic and coarse-material matter?