Hey C.B.,
Your short True Pi=3.1446 proof is 100% pure FAKE as previously indicated and as I had explained but you're not smart enough to understand the flaws ni your own logic. However this is also why not a single academic in the entire world takes your True Pi=3.1446 nonsense seriously, nor will any academic listen to Arthur's fake True Pi=3.1446 proofs. That's why academia have ignored both of you for years, because all you know and understand is your fake pretend math trickery. Why not be constructive while in this forum, and share discussion and information regarding Billy Meier's information about Pi.
The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle
Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle
- Attachments
-
- piGeometry1.jpg (59.39 KiB) Viewed 29810 times
-
- piGeometry2.jpg (52.06 KiB) Viewed 29810 times
-
- piGeometry3.jpg (46.59 KiB) Viewed 29810 times
Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle
Yes I know that work and he doesn’t take the KT as a premise, otherwise he wouldn’t have done all that geometrical demonstration, he would just claim the long leg is π/4 and finish.
He claims 3.1446 to be an approximation just to avoid anger with his colleagues, otherwise the geometric derivations is no approximation at all.
You just concentrate on the math of my derivation and mark the mistake if you find one. Otherwise don’t blur the waters unnecessarily.
He claims 3.1446 to be an approximation just to avoid anger with his colleagues, otherwise the geometric derivations is no approximation at all.
You just concentrate on the math of my derivation and mark the mistake if you find one. Otherwise don’t blur the waters unnecessarily.
Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle
I know he is not talking about Kepler's triangle, and I do not show it or take it as a premise in my post.
I just said it at the end as the consequence.
I say "unsurprisingly" because in every geometric demonstration with the true value of pi, especially with squaring the circle, there is always a Kepler triangle somewhere. Because it is the link between the square and the circle.
I just said it at the end as the consequence.
I say "unsurprisingly" because in every geometric demonstration with the true value of pi, especially with squaring the circle, there is always a Kepler triangle somewhere. Because it is the link between the square and the circle.
Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle
With the values of the Areas of the Circle and the Square, b and b^2 we can construct a triangle to use Pythagoras and find out the exact value of π.
And, if it is a KT ,well. All the better, because it hints at more and divers relationships btw Circles, Squares and triangles.
But, first of all, the value 3.1446 shows that Space can’t be measured in the same way with straight or with circular lines. And this is a crucial point many 3.14159 fanatics overlook.
3.14159 is a static value whereas 3.1446 has to do with movement, circular movement.
And, if it is a KT ,well. All the better, because it hints at more and divers relationships btw Circles, Squares and triangles.
But, first of all, the value 3.1446 shows that Space can’t be measured in the same way with straight or with circular lines. And this is a crucial point many 3.14159 fanatics overlook.
3.14159 is a static value whereas 3.1446 has to do with movement, circular movement.
Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle
Hey C.B. and Arthur,
This is amazing stuff, holly cow, you guys are brilliant the way you toss your pretend math concepts around like a salad or kids in kindergarten playing with their toy blocks. Imagine using your true and correct Pi=3.1446 value which you've proven to yourselves, it wont be too long before you've figured out how to tap into the energy of black-holes cause I'm really looking forward to using a black-hole powered lawn mower once you two ingenues-ess figure it out. Just let me know if there is anything I can do to help, if you need someone to color, or do some physical measuring of squares or circles, heck I can even bring some donuts to help with your brain-storming sessions. This could be a fun team effort working on trying to prove True Pi=3.1446 after 8-years of constant failure. Keep up the good work boys - I'm proud of you!
This is amazing stuff, holly cow, you guys are brilliant the way you toss your pretend math concepts around like a salad or kids in kindergarten playing with their toy blocks. Imagine using your true and correct Pi=3.1446 value which you've proven to yourselves, it wont be too long before you've figured out how to tap into the energy of black-holes cause I'm really looking forward to using a black-hole powered lawn mower once you two ingenues-ess figure it out. Just let me know if there is anything I can do to help, if you need someone to color, or do some physical measuring of squares or circles, heck I can even bring some donuts to help with your brain-storming sessions. This could be a fun team effort working on trying to prove True Pi=3.1446 after 8-years of constant failure. Keep up the good work boys - I'm proud of you!
Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle
This is a message to everyone reading this thread regarding the false and foolish claim True Pi=3.1446 which is a LIE and contradicts Billy Meier's Contact Reports #251, #712 & #722. Please note that its not just Arthur and C.B., but any buffoon who constantly pushes their True Pi=3.1466 LIE propaganda onto the FIGU Community, none of them, NOT ONCE, NOT EVER, refer to Billy Meier's information about Pi simply because Billy Meier's information about Pi states clearly TRUE Pi is UNKNOWN in CR #722 and would rob the Pi-Radicals of their True Pi=3.1446 LIE fun-times in here so that's why they avoid referring to Billy Meier's information about Pi, when discussing the True Pi Value. The Pi-Radicals cannot accept that the True value of Pi is UNKNOWN, they actually think they've solved the True Value of Pi=3.1446 which directly contradicts Billy Meier's Contact Reports information about Pi. I have no idea why the Pi-Radicals ignore Billy Meier's information about Pi, but it may be because they're so brain-washed into believing their True Pi=3.1446 nonsense LIE.
Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle
Just saw you edited (added a sentence) in your previous post after i read it.
I explained the flaws of your demonstration in my previous post.
1 - A circle with diameter 1 and so circumference = pi.
ok.
2 - 4b = pi.
a - So you assume that the circle can be squared. Pi being the circumference and b a length, 4b a square.
How do you know that ? You dont't say "let suppose the circle can be squared"
b - You are searching the value of pi but you use it in you hypothesis.
So you use the result of your demonstration as a term of your hypothesis.
So it cannot be a discovery. This is what is known as circular reasoning.
3 - You define a right triangle (1, b^2, b).
Why this one among the thousands of right triangles that can be inscribed in the semicircle ? Where is the logic ?
Flaws :
2a
2b
3
Why do you say that ?C.B. wrote: Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:56 pm You just concentrate on the math of my derivation and mark the mistake if you find one. Otherwise don’t blur the waters unnecessarily.
I explained the flaws of your demonstration in my previous post.
1 - A circle with diameter 1 and so circumference = pi.
ok.
2 - 4b = pi.
a - So you assume that the circle can be squared. Pi being the circumference and b a length, 4b a square.
How do you know that ? You dont't say "let suppose the circle can be squared"
b - You are searching the value of pi but you use it in you hypothesis.
So you use the result of your demonstration as a term of your hypothesis.
So it cannot be a discovery. This is what is known as circular reasoning.
3 - You define a right triangle (1, b^2, b).
Why this one among the thousands of right triangles that can be inscribed in the semicircle ? Where is the logic ?
Flaws :
2a
2b
3
Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle
2 - 4b = pi.
a - So you assume that the circle can be squared. Pi being the circumference and b a length, 4b a square. How do you know that ? You dont't say "let suppose the circle can be squared"
The “Squaring of the Circle” refers indeed to the Area and not to the Perimeter.
And, as I told already, if we cannot equal 4b=π then we can’t establish any equality anymore btw geometric figures. Geometry would be dead.
4b=π is in fact an analogy. A reciprocal proportion.
b - You are searching the value of pi but you use it in you hypothesis.
So you use the result of your demonstration as a term of your hypothesis.
So it cannot be a discovery. This is what is known as circular reasoning.
You have to differentiate. There is a nominal value “π” and there is its numerical value. I may use very well its nominal value to find an equation to obtain the numerical value.
When you write the unknown x in math, you are writing the nominal value of the unknown and you look for an analogy to find out its numerical value. Nothing of circular reasoning.
3 - You define a right triangle (1, b^2, b).
Why this one among the thousands of right triangles that can be inscribed in the semicircle ? Where is the logic ?
The logic is simple. We have two expressions of the same value b and b^2, in a form that we can construct a right triangle with it. It is not my arbitrary will to do so. The areas yield these values. I have still to justify the value of the hypotenuse that I do and then can construct the triangle and solve it.
We could even say we have three expressions of the same value b^0; b^1 and b^2, but this belongs to another derivation of π
a - So you assume that the circle can be squared. Pi being the circumference and b a length, 4b a square. How do you know that ? You dont't say "let suppose the circle can be squared"
The “Squaring of the Circle” refers indeed to the Area and not to the Perimeter.
And, as I told already, if we cannot equal 4b=π then we can’t establish any equality anymore btw geometric figures. Geometry would be dead.
4b=π is in fact an analogy. A reciprocal proportion.
b - You are searching the value of pi but you use it in you hypothesis.
So you use the result of your demonstration as a term of your hypothesis.
So it cannot be a discovery. This is what is known as circular reasoning.
You have to differentiate. There is a nominal value “π” and there is its numerical value. I may use very well its nominal value to find an equation to obtain the numerical value.
When you write the unknown x in math, you are writing the nominal value of the unknown and you look for an analogy to find out its numerical value. Nothing of circular reasoning.
3 - You define a right triangle (1, b^2, b).
Why this one among the thousands of right triangles that can be inscribed in the semicircle ? Where is the logic ?
The logic is simple. We have two expressions of the same value b and b^2, in a form that we can construct a right triangle with it. It is not my arbitrary will to do so. The areas yield these values. I have still to justify the value of the hypotenuse that I do and then can construct the triangle and solve it.
We could even say we have three expressions of the same value b^0; b^1 and b^2, but this belongs to another derivation of π
Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle
It's so cute watching the two Pi-Radicals C.B. and Arthur bicker over each other's faked Pi=3.1446 LIE nonsense proofs, like watching two lovers quarreling over who can control the remote on the TV, and neither can agree who is correct. Thanks for the entertainment guys - too funny. Its no wonder its taken 8-years and counting and still no progress getting your faked Pi=3.1446 proofs recognized by academia. I mean lets face it, if you can't even agree amongst yourselves, what chance have you convincing the world True Pi=3.1446 (LOL). Say I brought donuts, help yourselves, least I could do for the entertainment you're providing, and I specifically asked Dukin Donuts to make their donuts circumference equal Pi=3.1446 but they had no idea what I was talking about, but the truth be told, no one understands your Pi=3.1446 nonsense, that is, no one intelligent understand the pretend math nonsense of C.B. and Arthur who can't even understand each other's pretend math nonsense - too funny. Keep up the fight there C.B. and Arthur, if you need crayons to help settle your dispute just ask, I've got a whole box and lots of colors to chose from.