The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

[Hush]

well C.B.,

Wow, you were actually brave enough to crawl out of your lazy boy rocker, put the donuts aside, slap on some flip-flops, and actually venture outside and visited an accredited professor in mathematics and showed them your less-than-one-page faked Pi=3.1446 proof? Holly cow man, you're just like Johnny Knoxville, the Jackass TV star who does stupid stunts to get a laugh, and you actually finally did it, well done there C.B. showing a university mathematics professor what is, in my opinion, arguably the worse Pi=3.1446 proof I've ever seen, even Harry Lear did a better job faking his Pi=3.1446 proof.

So do tell, what did the professor have to say about your faked Pi=3.1446 proof. We're all on pins-and-needles here, do give us all the juicy details of what the professor had to say about your less-than-one-page faked Pi=3.1446 proof.

Although you may have listened to what the professor said, undoubtedly sounds like you really didn't listen did you? Seems whatever the professor said went in one ear and out the other, and nothing they said really SUNK in did it? Of course when you think you're superior and smarter than every mathematician in the world, having invented a new derivation for Pi=3.1446, its probably quite humiliating to be told by a university professor in mathematics, someone whom you probably feel is inferior to your intellect, that your Pi=3.1446 derivation is a faked. Now that had to be humiliating.

So now I understand why you're stuck in here, continually posting your faked Pi=3.1446 nonsense, trying to convince anyone who will listen, that your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is valid. Look let me help you, since you've tried and obviously failed to convince an academic, accredited in mathematics, that your less-than-one-page faked Pi=3.1446 proof is valid, lets start by working on your Pi-Radical buddies in here and get them convinced that your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is valid and so far you're not doing very well.

Gotta start by playing nice with your Pi-Radical buddies. Remember they're on your side, like you they foolishly believe True Pi=3.1446 so don't lose your cool with your Pi-Radicals buddies, honestly they're the only support you really have, just as naive and uneducated in mathematics as you, so you shouldn't get hot-headed with 777 ok. Just cool down a bit, and instead of pushing your Pi=3.1446 nonsense, try and complement both Arthur and 777 how much you really like their faked Pi=3.1446 proofs. Don't make this just about you all the time and you're faked Pi=3.1446 proof ok. Yes you're smarter than everyone else, or so you believe, but try to keep that abundant arrogance tamed down for a bit. For example tell Arthur and 777 that their Pi=3.1446 proofs are really cool, and that their proofs have a golden ratio resonance that makes you feel all tingly inside and then, if you take that first step, and be nice, they'll be more receptive to agreeing with your faked Pi=3.1446 proof. Its the old you scratch my back I'll scratch your back buddy system you know C.B.. I mean in this case real mathematics has nothing to do with it, since all Pi=3.1446 proofs are faked, so in this case, its all about building relationships between your Pi-Radical buddies.

For example don't question every GeoGebra screen capture 777 presents, but express how expertly they look. Approach Arthur and complement him on his faked Pi=3.1446 proofs, and then may be he'll say something nice about your less-than-one-page faked Pi proof. You see, you need to understand when you're dealing with FAKED Pi=3.1446 proofs, the mathematics don't matter so much because any Pi=3.1446 proof is all pretend math anyways, so as a Pi-Radical pushing your faked Pi=3.1446 proof, what matters more is building relationships, connections, trust in each other's faked Pi=3.1446 proofs.

Hope this helps C.B. and no need to thank me.

[omedam777]

Look. I'm not going to spend time trying to convince you of the obvious. By whichever magic trick you arrived at Pi 3.1446 is your prerogative. We already established that Hush talks nonsense about the other Pi so I'm not even entertaining a conversation with him/her.

As for C.B., your intentions may be well placed... but we all want to know where you got your b = 0.786151.

if it's just b^4+b^2-1, then that is nothing new as it is x^4+x^2-1. In other words... you are inflating yourself on a quad equation a great majority of scientists and mathematicians know. Otherwise it wouldn't be on Wikipedia in the first place. Basically in the "Golden Ratio" section -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio.

C.B., you seem to have a predefine understanding of a proof which might escape us, because for the number of proofs provided, I wonder why you act so hard-headedly.

Pi doesn't belong to me, or to you, or anyone for that matter. Pi just exists, much like the Creation exists. And the goal is to find it because its accordance relates to the Creation.

If none of you have the slightest understanding of that, then before scouring through Pi head first like a Juggernaut, I suggest that both you and Hush spend time reading the Goblet of the Truth and see where you fell.

I can see past my own mistake, that's why when C.B. pointed out that I wrote b^2+b-1 instead of b^4+b^2-1 I then corrected myself. Because I know that I am accountable for my words and actions. Nevertheless, the result remains the same. That which you wrote as b^4+b^2-1 is the same as that which you called nonsense, namely x^4+x^2-1.

Also... the still elementary equation for Pi is still equal has 4/sqrt(phi) whereas the Circuference is 4 and the radius is sqrt(phi), because if we are to do the same equation with the conventional Pi, then the radius IS STILL AND REMAINS A CLOSE APPROXIMATION OF THE SQUARE ROOT OF THE GOLDEN RATIO.

But I don't care now that you want to play thich-heads with Hush. It is... unfortunate. And I see the future of this world dwindelling so ever more, because no one wants to thinks logically. Everyone now loves Drama way more than engaging in social and mature conversations.

Im here repeating the same shit, Arthur is repeating the same shit, others have done so has well, and these are the ones who did brought forth GOLDMINES FOR THOUGHTS.

What has Hush brought? Slander, defamation, insults, a know-it-all attitude.

And what has C.B. brought? An equation to which he dares not explain why b is equal to 0.786151 in comparison with his previous equation which at the beginnig looks right until one has to figure out why b suddenly switched from 0.785 to 0.786.

STILL... WE ALL KNOW THAT B^4+B^2-1 = X^4+X^2-1 = 0... SO WHY THE HELL ARE WE ENTERTAINING POINTLESS QUESTIONS LIKE A POINTLESS RUNAROUND ON A MERRY GO ROUND????

[omedam777]

Honestly, I want to see more people talk about Pi like civilized people. Not like damn clowns.

[Hush]

Too late 777,

...the clowns are already here....pushing their Pi=3.1446 nonsense and refusing to accept Billy Meier's Contact Report #722, where he states True Pi is UNKNOWN, which obviously means True Pi=3.1446 is FAKED, but the Pi-Radical clowns don't trust Billy Meier's Contact Reports information about Pi it seems, which is pretty sad, sad as a clown.

[C.B.]

Look. I'm not going to spend time trying to convince you of the obvious. By whichever magic trick you arrived at Pi 3.1446 is your prerogative.

Ok. You got me.
I will share my secret on how I arrived to the magic number 3.1446: The Secret is called “Mathematics”. But it stays btw us Ok?

As for C.B., your intentions may be well placed... but we all want to know where you got your b = 0.786151.

Hey! You want to know all my secrets!

if it's just b^4+b^2-1, then that is nothing new as it is x^4+x^2-1. In other words... you are inflating yourself on a quad equation a great majority of scientists and mathematicians know. Otherwise it wouldn't be on Wikipedia in the first place. Basically in the "Squaring The Circle" section.

I’m not inflating myself. No. You’re inflating me.
x^4+x^2-1=0 is nothing new? Of course it is nothing new. Numbers as such are nothing new either. Logarithms are nothing new. √ is nothing new. It is how you combine them to produce something new.

C.B., you seem to have a predefine understanding of a proof which might escape us, because for the number of proofs provided, I wonder why you act so hard-headedly.

Sorry for being so honest to you. but, if you can’t really understand this simple derivation the blame is on you and not on me. It is really basic school level.

Pi doesn't belong to me, or to you, or anyone for that matter. Pi just exists, much like the Creation exists. And the goal is to find it because its accordance relates to the Creation.

Yes. And so what? did I call it the CB π? It is there for everyone to use it in the best way possible. But you just took it up with me, for no reason.

And what has C.B. brought? An equation to which he dares not explain why b is equal to 0.786151 in comparison with his previous equation which at the beginnig looks right until one has to figure out why b suddenly switched from 0.785 to 0.786.

I told you already to quote such statements. So we can see where did you find them. Ok?

STILL... WE ALL KNOW THAT B^4+B^2-1 = X^4+X^2-1 = 0... SO WHY THE HELL ARE WE ENTERTAINING POINTLESS QUESTIONS LIKE A POINTLESS RUNAROUND ON A MERRY GO ROUND????

So pay attention, because here we can nail how ignorant you’re in the most simple things:

b^4+b^2–1=0 is not the same as x^4+x^2–1=0. Simply because x lacks the connection to b=π/4. And this is the key point of the derivation, to show that x^4+x^2–1=0 is in fact b^4+b^2–1=0. The Connection to the π value
But you’re much too intelligent to realize it by yourself. Isn’t it, 777?

[C.B.]

Too late 777,

...the clowns are already here....pushing their Pi=3.1446 nonsense and refusing to accept Billy Meier's Contact Report #722, where he states True Pi is UNKNOWN, which obviously means True Pi=3.1446 is FAKED, but the Pi-Radical clowns don't trust Billy Meier's Contact Reports information about Pi it seems, which is pretty sad, sad as a clown.

Tell me the last time you asked Billy Meier and his Space Friends if they still hold to that statement about π?

[omedam777]

b^4+b^2–1=0 is not the same as x^4+x^2–1=0. Simply because x lacks the connection to b=π/4. And this is the key point of the derivation, to show that x^4+x^2–1=0 is in fact b^4+b^2–1=0. The Connection to the π value
But you’re much too intelligent to realize it by yourself. Isn’t it, 777?

The math is dynamic. In Algebra, the letter only represents the number... it can be substituted... ANYTIME. So yes! b^4+b^2-1 = x^4+x2-1 = 0 as much as it could easily be d^4+d^2-1 = 0 and that still yields the same result. It could be the whole slew of alphabets... the result would still remain the same.

Only a shift in the numbers would change everything.

That's why I stand by my claim. You are inflating yourself. Plus limiting yourself. Did I mention that you are proving your self to be a clown. I might call you Terence Howard, but then again, if I were to investigate his claim of 1*1=2... it would be a funny thing if this were true. But because I haven't, I'm not going to linger on that subject. That's something for another time.

You said, and I quote:

Simply because x lacks the connection to b=π/4

Yet... a letter cannot change the value of a number. Only a number can do that. Unless you take the face value of each numbers, then b being the second letter would give 2*π/4, which we can both agree that this is nonsense. So what are you actually saying? That b has magical properties? That it is better than x, despite the fact that both are letter and hold no value except the ones we assign to them?

That's why I keep on standing firm on my ground that you are truly expressing clownish views and behaviours.

Think about it:

The Value is π/4. B is merely its representative. Like the rest of the 26 letters of the alphabets!

I mean... how old are you? 10?

[Hush]

oh C.B.,

There you go again changing the subject, anyway I've never asked Billy Meier anything and unsure what this has to do with you trying to credibly prove your Pi=3.1446 nonsense which you've never been able to do in 8+ years. I mean you can't even convince 777 or Arthur, your very own Pi-Radical buddies, that your less-than-one-page Pi=3.1446 proof is valid.

Say do tell, what did the professor have to say about your faked Pi=3.1446 proof when you showed it to them, or are you too embarrassed to share, in which case I do understand your decision to remain silent, kind of like the same way Christian Frehner and Michael Horn have remained silent after contradicting Billy Meier's Contact Reports information about Pi.

But since you let the cat out-of-the-bag, admitting to visiting a university professor and showed them your faked Pi=3.1446 proof, we're all on pins-and-needles interested in learning what advice the professor gave you about your faked Pi=3.1446 proof, or did you just storm out of their office, really mad they didn't understand your brilliant 1/2 page Pi=3.1446 derivation. It must be tough to believe your the smartest mathematician in the world whose invented a new Pi=3.1446 derivation and nobody believe you, not even your own buddy Pi-Radicals (LOL).

[omedam777]

let's say for example... do you truly believe that the logarithmic table just appeared out of nowhere with log() as the main base to the formula? Nah man -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirifici_ ... n_approach

[omedam777]

Everything starts with numbers. And season this with PEDMAS.