The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Discuss anything else here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Arthur
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2025 9:48 am
Contact:

Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Post by Arthur »

omedam777 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:38 pm I don't have all of the answers. Seek.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/uf7bswdjir
Thank you for pointing out another calculation involving 4/√ɸ.

I found this video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIy7xbn3jJs

Once again, the problem lies in the confusion between segment and curve.
He attempts to measure the circumference using a “unit” derived from the diameter.
The diameter is a straight line and the circumference is a circle. Knowing that a circle cannot be transposed, copied, duplicated using a segment, a line, or the edge of a polygon, he inevitably concludes that pi is the approximation we know, namely 3.14159.

This is yet another attempt to measure the circumference of a circle using a ruler. The gap between the side and the curve therefore generates the approximation.
The more sides there are, the smaller and more numerous they are.

3.1415926 is not the ratio between the circumference of a circle and its diameter, but rather the circumference of a simulated circle created using the sides of a polygon (line segment). The difference creates the approximation.
Last edited by Arthur on Sat Sep 13, 2025 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
C.B.
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2025 9:21 am

Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Post by C.B. »

omedam777 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:38 pm I don't have all of the answers. Seek.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/uf7bswdjir
And how do you know it is “for balance and precision”?
User avatar
Arthur
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2025 9:48 am
Contact:

Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Post by Arthur »

omedam777 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:38 pm I don't have all of the answers. Seek.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/uf7bswdjir
Your geometric figure shows, among other things, that the base of the pyramid (which is the same proportion as the Pyramid of Giza (2 Kepler triangles)) * the height of the gray triangle on the left (which is another Kepler triangle) = circumference of the circle. --> 4 * 8 = 32.
Last edited by Arthur on Sat Sep 13, 2025 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Hush
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2025 11:27 pm

Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Post by Hush »

Well Arthur and omedam777,
Arthur wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:59 pm
omedam777 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:38 pm I don't have all of the answers. Seek.

Once again, the problem lies in the confusion between segment and curve.

The only CONFUSION stems from the Know-it-All Pi-Radicals who foolishly claim True Pi=3.1446 based on their nonsense pretend math tricks and all lack accreditation in mathematics and do not understand real mathematics which easily proves traditional Pi=3.14159 remains the best estimate of True Pi.

Why would anyone trust Christian Frehner, Michael Horn or any other Pi-Radical Know-it-All who foolishly claims True Pi=3.1446 if they lack accreditation in mathematics? Christian Frehner and Michael Horn LACK accreditation in mathematics, they are NOT mathematicians, yet they both supported and promoted Harry Lear's foolish claim True Pi=3.1446. Why would Christian and Michael do that, promote True Pi=3.1446 if they have NO UNDERSTANDING of MATHEMATICS, which is absolute stupidity. At the very least should have stated their belief as an opinion nothing more, because stating True Pi=3.1446 contradicts information about Pi in Billy Meier's Contact Reports yet neither Christian nor Michael acknowledge this fact and still chose to support and promote Harry Lear's True Pi=3.1446 LIE instead of trusting Billy Meier's information about Pi in CRs #251, #712 and #722 - one must ask why?

Christian Frehner and Michael Horn should have qualified their belief true Pi=3.1446 by first admitting they are not mathematicians, that they are not accredited in mathematics, and are expressing opinion they believe Harry Lear had proven True Pi=3.1446 even though their belief contradicts Billy Meier's Contact Reports information about Pi in CRs #251, #712 & #722. I mean both Christian and Michael have dedicated their lives to sharing Billy Meier's truth, so as a Billy Meier spokesperson, if you're going to contradict Billy Meier's Contact Reports information about Pi, may be you should qualify your belief up-front, and make it clear you don't agree with Billy Meier's Contact Report information before you claim True Pi=3.1446 like a good-little-responsible FIGU spokesperson boy! But what actually happened - well Christian Frehner's article in FIGU Sign of the Times #77, foolishly states his opinion, that Harry Lear had solved True Pi=3.1446, as FACT. They say the devil is in the details and this insight, when you really drill down and examine the fact, and realize Christian Frehner and Michael Horn are responsible for promoting and spreading Harry Lear's True PI=3.1446 LIE to the FIGU Community, and have nothing to say for themselves, proves beyond any doubt, there is something fundamentally wrong with both Christian Frehner and Michael Horn neither of whom are able to come forward and admit they contradicted Billy Meier's Contact Report's information about Pi.

Why should anyone of good common sense believe your claim True Pi=3.1446 if you do not have accreditation in mathematics? Who would you trust to fix a broken air conditioner, a technician qualified and trained in HVAC or someone who states they know how to solve the problem but have no training? There may be exceptions of course, but the average person is going to trust and pay for services from someone who is trained in the profession ok, that's just common sense. Yet here we have non-mathematicians, with no qualifications claiming True Pi=3.1446 and cannot get a single academic accredited in mathematics to believe them so why should anyone of us believe the Pi-Radicals foolish claim True Pi=3.1446 - huh?

Every mathematician in the world knows True Pi = 3.1446 is a LIE but if True Pi=3.1446 as you Pi-Radicals foolishly claim, well that would make you the smartest mathematician in the world wouldn't it, so why aren't you working for NASA or SpaceX smarty-pants? Well maybe you're not nearly as smart as you think, and what's really going on here, is that you've brainwashed yourselves into believing this True Pi=3.1446 nonsense using your pretend math trickery and unable to understand the flaws in your mathematical proofs because you have no accreditation in mathematics.

The truth is NOBODY credible, intelligent, is listening to your PI=3.1446 LIE nonsense because you don't understand real mathematics, you're not accredited in math so you believe all your pretend math Pi=3.1446 nonsense - you don't know any better but your arrogance is amazing, that you actually lack the humility to consider that maybe you're just not smart enough to understand the flaws in your Pi=3.1446 LIES logic. Seriously if you cannot phantom why a line-segmented polygon is a valid, credible and excellent method to estimate traditional Pi=3.14159, which remains the best estimate of True Pi, this proves you're way out of your league trying to understand real mathematics - go to school ok, learn math, then you can come back here and apologize for your foolishness promoting the True Pi=3.1446 LIE.

Its not just the world leading academics who know traditional Pi=3.14159 is the best estimate of true Pi and true Pi=3.1446 is LIE, but also Billy Meier knows this fact that True Pi is UNKNOWN. Why don't you Pi-Radicals refer to Billy Meier's information about Pi huh? In CR 722 Billy Meier clearly states True Pi is UNKNOWN, which means True Pi=3.1446 is a LIE.

Yup you Pi-Radicals are confused alright, and don't have the answers because you ignore Billy Meier's Contact Reports references to Pi, because you ignore conventional wisdom, because you don't understand traditional mathematics, you all lack a formal education in mathematics, therefore all you understand is your pretend math concepts, and you're not smart enough to understand the flaws in your own logic and that is the TRUTH.
Last edited by Hush on Tue Sep 16, 2025 4:27 pm, edited 3 times in total.
omedam777
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2025 3:18 pm

Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Post by omedam777 »

C.B. wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 4:14 pm
omedam777 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:38 pm I don't have all of the answers. Seek.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/uf7bswdjir
And how do you know it is “for balance and precision”?
Because it is obvious
C.B.
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2025 9:21 am

Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Post by C.B. »

omedam777 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:10 pm
C.B. wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 4:14 pm
omedam777 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:38 pm I don't have all of the answers. Seek.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/uf7bswdjir
And how do you know it is “for balance and precision”?
Because it is obvious
Ok 777, it is obvious. Obvious in what. If you have the intention to do math then you should show some evidence of what you claim.
Just making statements is not helpful and doesn’t mean anything.
C.B.
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2025 9:21 am

Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Post by C.B. »

The only CONFUSION stems from the Know-it-All Pi-Radicals who foolishly claim True Pi=3.1446 based on their nonsense pretend math tricks and all lack accreditation in mathematics and do not understand real mathematics which easily proves traditional Pi=3.14159 remains the best estimate of True Pi…..etc etc etc….


…and you still playing the same record once again.
Don’t get tired of the nonsense?
User avatar
Hush
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2025 11:27 pm

Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Post by Hush »

oh C.B.,

Grow up, how could sharing the TRUTH be tiring?

Rather the foolish Pi-Radical, know-it-all's (CR #712, Ptaah) who continue to mindlessly push the True Pi=3.1446 LIE onto the FIGU Community, remain dazed and confused like a deer caught in the headlights. Its interesting how you Pi-Radicals never understand each other's faked True Pi=3.1446 proofs, as in this case the current discussion between you and 777 can't understand each other and previously, your exchange with Arthur, which I believe is still unresolved.

I don't think I've actually seen anyone of you Pi-Radicals agree with each other's True Pi=3.1446 faked proofs in 8-years, because you don't work well together, you're always off in your own little tiny-tiny worlds inventing new fake Pi=3.1446 pretend math proofs, convinced you've invented a new math only you understand but unable to convince anyone of your Pi-Radical buddies of your pretend math concepts.

Lets face it, its been 8+ years you've been working on this True Pi=3.1446 nonsense and have never demonstrated a credible proof in all that time, because they're all pretend math nonsense, sometimes generated using GeoGebra drawings unware GeoGeobra uses traditional Pi=3.14159 to draw all circles and arcs - so are you feeling a little like a dimwit trying to prove True Pi=3.1446 using GeoGebra drawings? I'm pretty sure all you Pi-Radicals are experts in the GeoGebra software designed to help kids learn math. Maybe that's where you belong though, in the still learning math phase.

What's tiring is this brainwashed mentality pushing True Pi=3.1446 for 8-years with no success to show for yourselves. No one intelligent is listening to your True Pi=3.1446 nonsense, you Pi-Radicals have been completely ignored by academia, so its really tiring listening to your True Pi=3.1446 nonsense LIE. Don't know how you find the energy to keep pushing the True Pi=3.1446 LIE for 8-years and counting, like are you taking Viagra, is that where you're getting your energy to promote your True Pi=3.1446 LIE after 8-years and never tire of it (LOL).
Last edited by Hush on Mon Sep 15, 2025 12:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
C.B.
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2025 9:21 am

Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Post by C.B. »

Hush wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:34 pm Grow up, how could sharing the TRUTH be tiring?
Sharing the Truth?
What is tiring is you writing nonsense for over thousand comments without a shred of evidence to confirm any of your claims. This is tiring.
User avatar
Hush
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2025 11:27 pm

Re: The Non Transcendental, Exact Value of π and the Squaring of the Circle

Post by Hush »

oh C.B.,

Lets not forget our positions, you're the one foolishly claiming True Pi=3.1446, so prove it, and quite changing the subject smarty-pants (LOL).

I'm not obligated to prove anything, you're the one sitting in your Lazy Boy rocker foolishly claiming True Pi=3.1446 unable to prove it. Have you given up and now demanding the rest of the world prove to you why Traditional Pi = 3.14159 is VALID? Well unless you've been living in a cave, how about get off your Lazy Boy chair, put down those donuts, and search the internet where you'll find hundreds of websites dedicated to proving Traditional Pi=3.14159 unless, of course, you've been too busy coloring your faked Pi=3.1446 pretend math proofs.
Post Reply