IPQ I wouldn't mind learning the lingo 
Immigrants should adopt the culture they move into.
Preparing for climate catastrophe
James Moore Interesting. I'm currently at about 9 metres. But yes, 50 metres should be enough for our lifetimes. If I remember correctly the sealevel will rise to around 220 feet. It's amazing how much of the shore has been erroded in the time that I've lived here. I used to walk along a path along the shore with a fence alongside, both of which washed away years ago.
James Moore I suppose this would depend on the area one lives in. If it was on the coast of a country where the possibility of a tsunami could occur offshore then higher the better but for example if it was on the east coast of Ireland it could be lower due to the risk of a tsunami happening there would be very low.
Billy did mention in a report how one should build at least 200 meters away from the shore…..
We were going to go to Arizona, or New Mexico, but also feeling drawn to Central America or South America. I've been heavily into social studies for those areas and enjoy a warmer climate whenever possible. Want to have a large garden, our own food supply.
Pureharmony Where are you currently and what is not so good about it?
Hello James , did you see this ? > https://theyflyblog.com/2023/03/todays-news-published-by-billy-meier-42-years-ago/
Russia will use a Poseidon underwater missile to wipe Britain off the map with a 1,000ft-high radioactive tsunami if NATO troops put boots on the ground in Ukraine, Putin’s propagandists claim
Of course, you could’ve just read Billy Meier’s prediction from November 20, 1981:
“All nations, bordering the North Sea, and the British Island will be destroyed by a horrible stormflood, on the one hand, due to the dropping of a stormflood bomb and, on the other hand, due to a stormflood caused by a typhoon. Cities and villages will sink and drown into the ocean as well as a part of Scotland.”
Salome
James Moore
West Coast of usa. Can't garden year round here, & i like tropical weather or warmer than WA State. At some point, there's supposed to be a big quake here from the subduction zone off the coast, and huge tsunami as a result.
G3r4ld yes it was on UK national news. Some Russian politicians like to make big threats. I'm not sure how that nuclear torpedo could cause a 500 m high tsunami. Do you know how?
Pureharmony I read about that mega tsunami prediction near the coast off Portland, in CR392. It could happen anytime it seems. What's your height above sea level?
I know of a family that moved from USA to Mexico City. The electricity costs are peanuts in comparison e.g. $50/month. And there is not a big crime problem everywhere.
James Moore Mexico City sounds fantastic! We certainly love the culture there, and the food is fantastic.
We're about 500 feet above sea level right now.
James Moore they work on a principle of wave forming, the frequency builds and resonates with itself. The research is on super Tsunamis which appear as a function of volume of displacement compared to the maximum wave possible in the medium of water. At a point where the internal dynamics of the wave are effectively frictionless the large displacement travels at very high speed for a distance where the phenomena can be maintained based on the volumes of water present.
Simulation shows that historical events of 100 meters over gulfs known for mantle activity, explaining high shell and sea life findings from archaeology. The speculated super Tsunamis have wave forms of 2000m based on high altitude findings in certain areas of the globe. My preferred studies show relatively small displacements causing 400m waves capable of transversing the Atlantic and maintaining speed from the fluid dynamics. Its very hard to take large pool University studies and extrapolate but the archaeology suggests these are relatively common in terms of centuries with exceptional waves matching known periods of earth activity or speculated asteroid activity.
The bomb therefore is timed to create a pressure wave below the surface at a point where the displacement will reflect the magnitude back from the sea floor creating the low friction turbulance the super waves require. I have only read interpreted reports but the US tests in the Pacific started the bad idea and warmongers are stupid, so they probably followed through. I imagine all sides will have an idea of how to do this.
Rob Interesting thanks for the explanation. There are probably a lot of physics equations in there relating to the fluid dynamics and perhaps also the reaction of the Earth's crust when subject to nuclear explosive forces, which isn't something I specialize in.
James Moore I use theoretical principles in forming an analysis of an industry or phenomena. The key part is really the historic information, the initial ideas are often redacted, so its important to sweep the research for key principles. Often the public information is widely discredited but the fundamentals are understandable to any human with a foundation of natural thought. The Tsunami research like geological research tends not to have high foot fall, so more often than not the narrative line is less defined. If you look into the research on the volcanoes off Africa with the unstable/porus rock on the west side, the displacement creates quite a surge of water. The internal turbulence found in super Tsunamis almost requires a two stage collapse. The first displacement bouncing off the bottom and lifting the second displacement as the pressure wave moves through the water at high speed the natural friction occurs in the lower wave and either magnifies or sustains the main thrust of the wave. For the bomb version speculation about a detonation near the shelf causing a large amount of water to travel from very deep to comparatively shallow - the north sea is often no more than 10 meters. This causes the large standing wave. I expect being more than a kilometre inland helps, cities like New York and London obviously can't be saved. This was apparent in the insurance models in 2012, if you recall we all just paid more rather than adjusting policy...