_(Continuing the Article "The Reasons for Peace")
These are but open questions. No-one who is right in his mind wants them to come true.
In the following we will first discuss the historical background of our ‘Here and Now’ before returning to Billy’s insights.
2. Realizing The Opponent’s Common Humanity
To end a war the opposing parties need to recognize the common humanity of their opponent and change their mindset from one of hostility and mistrust to one of empathy and a willingness to cooperate.
We know that this happened during the reign of M. Gorbachev. We know that, ultimately, his truly humane idea of a peaceful co-relation did not come true. Billy’s historical account in CR 861 mirrors the insights of post-Cold War historian M. E. Sarotte’s book “:Not one inch: America, Russia and the Making of the Cold War Stalemate”:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/12/russias-belief-in-nato-betrayal-and-why-it-matters-today
Ms. Sarotte argues that there was an informal understanding that NATO would not take advantage of R. (not expand its membership closer to R.’s borders) and that, if this understanding was followed through, R. may have evolved into a much more democratic country. It is a bitter setback for mankind that M. Gorbachev’s sincerity and his principles of glasnost (“openness”/freedom of speech) and perestroika (“restructuring”/ more autonomy for enterprises) did not succeed.
3. A” Turning Back in Time”
As the chance to create a friendly co-relation was not taken there was a ‘turning back the time’ – in the East and West. E.g., in Russia today “There is a growing nostalgia for the Soviet Union period and S. as a leader. S. is seen as the main figure who defeated fascism, who gets the honours for victory in the Great Patriotic War. And that war victory is a symbol of national pride.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47975704
But for many non-Russians the era of St.’ism brings back dark memories.
Especially in many (east) European countries.
4. S.’s Objectives/Motivations – Western Responses
S’s main objective was the survival of the S. Union which he envisaged as the leader of the socialist world revolution. He wanted to save his country which suffered most during WW2,
5. The Conditions For Peace
Assuming that the historical evidence (as above) is correct and significant then to stop the U. War
it would need two leaders – one in the West and one in the East - who are willing to self-reflect. Who realize that C.’s broken informal promise (NATO membership of eastern European states) was but an effect of S.’s broken informal (Yalta) promise (not allowing free elections in eastern European states post WW2). Because as long as one or both sides feel “I have been betrayed” there is no willingness to create peace. But if the opposing sides realize that what happened was but an effect of their own doing they may be willing to – “let bygones be bygones” – “accept each other as one human race …” – “ … that never makes war against each other” – “and discuss a peace agreement an equal terms”.
6. A War Develops ‘A Mind Of Its Own’
It may be a wishful thought. Because the belief in destroying the opponent may already be too strong. And, as Billy mentions, a war develops ‘a mind of its own’:
“And time and again it has been proved that all the advance planning of all the belligerents has proved to be null and void, for always and in every war everything went completely differently from what was planned in advance, for everything plays out completely differently from what is planned in advance. And this will also prove to be the case in the war between Ukraine and Russia ...”
https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_861
This is a very serious situation. Peace on our planet, so it seems, is far off:
https://forum.futureofmankind.co.uk/d/13-billys-poem
7. One Glimmer of Hope
There is, however, one last glimmer of hope: The much discussed ‘Foreign to Earth’ ETs.
https://forum.futureofmankind.co.uk/d/43-foreign-to-earth-humans-non-plejaren-extraterrestrials-visiting-earth
In CR 861 Billy confirms Luis Elizondo’s statements about UAPs switching nuclear devices on/off and he tells us why they do so:
“These late descendants [of Foreign to Earth ETs] actually want peace on Earth and no wars etc.; for example, they have put nuclear missiles resp. their controls out of operation etc. And I w…”
https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_861
8. My Own View
I think what M. Gorbachev did was honest and sincere and, due to that, it will in a future time be the source of freedom and peace in our world. Yes, in his time his move was not understood, neither in the West nor in the East. So, what is happening now and in the near future is but a preparation of the minds that this truly humane – non-capitalist and non-communist - consciousness can evolve:
“What then of nations? In Russia there comes the hope of the world, not as that sometimes termed of the Communistic, of the Bolshevistic; no. But freedom, freedom! that each man will live for his fellow man! The principle has been born. It will take years for it to be crystallized, but out of Russia comes again the hope of the world. Guided by what? That friendship with the nation that hath even set on its present monetary unit "In God We Trust."
(Edgar Cayce, Reading 3976-29)
I truly wish all readers this heartfelt peace and friendship._
