Joseph_Emmanuel I don't understand. I get that you're supposed to think for yourself and draw your own conclusions - and to be fair, Billy would agree with your right to be wrong about something: we must all follow our own path and evolve at our own pace - but if you're going to read Billy's writings about the Teaching of the Truth, the Teaching of the Creation Energy, the Teaching of the Life, then why would you contradict what you're taught instead of accepting it and trying to understand why it is so?
Billy has been wrong about his predictions too and had to correct them. What if you had put your confidence and way of life in these wrong predictions and how do you know all he says is true at all?
He is a human being that can go astray too.
Besides, I’m not contradicting anything of what he teaches. I’m just trying to understand.
Joseph_Emmanuel Why would you add or take away from what is written, especially if you're talking about this stuff with people, whether members or friends of FIGU or not? You haven't even admitted that what you are saying is contrary to what Billy has said. People who don't know better could read your words and be misled. I'm not pretending to know more than you. I don't. For all I know, you could be right. But a lot of people who are familiar with Billy's writing and his life put their trust in him because a lot of what he has said and has written resonates with them, despite not being able to prove much, if any, of it.
I’m not adding or taking away anything of what is written. I just read what you write and answer according to my conclusions. To that, I’m not responsible for what others may or may not understand of what I say.
If a lot of people follow Billy’s assumptions and are happy with them because it “resonates” with them, even though there is no prove whatsoever for those assumptions, well, I’m happy for them. But this is not my way of acquiring knowledge. Even if Buddha says something wrong it is still wrong. Ok?
Why do you accuse me now of being dishonest?
