If its true, should we be dramatising these risks, why, no. Fear fiction drama for excitement and entertainment, deters sane people, all designed to increase the excitement rating, selfish. A persistent irritation is occurring with some readers, and it has caused a natural divide to occur, a rift in the community, naturally forming, where certain authors are dramatising the information on a regular basis. Ofcourse their readers love the drama, but what does it help, because the end of the world is exciting for them and maintains a captivation. It is an issue because genuine scientists are not interested in overinflated stories, this is not how they assess problems, turning them off. So, what is happening, the drama authors, take an already slightly fictionalised account from the rarer excerpts from BEAM's texts, then supercharge it, add fear in, add in insecurity, add in uncertainty etc., then the real politicians, real scientists etc., see it, don't see a solution, to fiction, see a dramatisation, fiction estranged from reality of the problem and dont bother to attempt to explore solutions. However, there is solutions built in to BEAM's texts already, but its small, too small to create an article about I suppose, and we're not allowed to hold a difference of opinion, growled at for criticising it. These dramatisations are irritating and selfish, enrich the authors, giving readers an unreal picture of the situation.
In FIGU Zeitzeitchen SE65 - Opening with the most high drama as usual
"In 2023, planet Earth is on the brink of several catastrophes at once: The climate catastrophe, which humanity itself has caused and is to blame for through its horrendous overpopulation, threatens to descend upon it with apocalyptic elemental force. A war in Eastern Europe could escalate into an all-destructive nuclear fiasco, the destructive potential of which no one in Europe can really imagine, but which is more frighteningly real than ever before."
For starters, 'brink of catastrophe', there is catastrophe every day depending on data being looking at, always has been. 'Overpopulation' responsible, well this doesn't hold water as many academically accredited commentators have examined, which is partially why its ignored unless its proportioned correctly, tell us something we can do something about, we can encourage voluntary contraception, cannot encourage dictatorship. Some nations are doing better now than at any time in their previous history, it is bordering insanity as a literary piece, gives headache, asking for a joined up solution worldwide between nations, we already do work together, focus on existing agreements, FIGU is against getting involved with politics anyway. 'Apocalyptic elemental force', what is, the weather, hurricanes always have high winds, that's why they are designated hurricane/typhoon. A war in eastern europe escalating, BEAM says Russia isn't interested in nuclear war, headache paradox again, but added in there to inflate the drama, and if its true should we be dramatising these risks, keyword 'imagine' used, good, but why imagine this grotty vision, a horrible waste of time, 'frighteningly real', real only occurs when it is real, this is fiction before the real, and a typical battlefield has one location, not a thousand locations across the globe does it. This has been specially designed as a literary piece to attract fiction readers, end of the world drama readers.
theyflyblog 'Edging Closer to the Abyss' February 2, 2024 - Opening with the most high drama as usual
"Humankind madly marches to its destruction, as the time fulfills" - recalls a text from 1981 which is later discredited by BEAM
'Abyss', another drama fiction word, a deep hole which doesn't exist anywhere, in fact we are further from any sort of imaginary blackhole now than at any previously recorded time in history, according to historical records, this deters immediately anyone who has read a history book. Its not marching anywhere, fictional imaginings again, humankind is spread throughout an entire giant sphere, divided by 200 or so nations, thousands of miles, really large space, separated by time, separated by individual human beings, who, where, what, this is an enclosed entertainment piece again. 'As the time fulfils' more fear fiction drama, the future is flexible, changeable, can be influenced by decision making and cognitive processes. All this drama its all designed to increase the excited rating.
There is no conversation going on here about genuine solutions, its all just high drama, fear, excitement, and if anyone questions it they are promptly told to get lost. It is irritating because sane people who can do something about all of this see it for what it is, fiction, and just move on, so its a closed loop isn't it, just entertainment for end of the world seekers of excitement, no one developing the kinds of text which may help.
Now for the controversial part, unfortunately we can easily deduce from the overinflated dramatisation, that one the readers seek insanity unreal as entertainment, and two that it has been necessary because, upon closer examination, there are no solutions which are useful and helpful, and worth wording in a sane commentary. So this final resolution becomes the conclusion, sadly. Either that or these authors have never bothered to examine if there are sane solutions, which begs the question why BEAM may have encouraged their writings for such extended periods of time.
This for example, already in the original texts
PPKB CR251
"...very problematic climate change, because the total temperature will drop enormously and will therefore sink. Not only the land, but also the seas will freeze by humanity's madness. As a result of this, a new invention is made, which, operated by cheapest energy, warms the Earth's atmosphere artificially."
