Future Of Mankind Forum

Hush wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 11:50 pm oh C.B.,

Lets not forget our positions, you're the one foolishly claiming True Pi=3.1446, so prove it, and quite changing the subject smarty-pants (LOL).

I'm not obligated to prove anything, you're the one sitting in your Lazy Boy rocker foolishly claiming True Pi=3.1446 unable to prove it. Have you given up and now demanding the rest of the world prove to you why Traditional Pi = 3.14159 is VALID? Well unless you've been living in a cave, how about get off your Lazy Boy chair, put down those donuts, and search the internet where you'll find hundreds of websites dedicated to proving Traditional Pi=3.14159 unless, of course, you've been too busy coloring your faked Pi=3.1446 pretend math proofs.

The derivation is at the beginning of this thread, simple and clear and your claim is that it is faked.

Prove it.

You quote ad infinitum Billy Meier and his Space Friends about π, that its real value is unknown.
Prove it.
Are you sure Billy and Friends still hold to that claim?
You’re not.
Have you seen any credentials from these Space Friends and Billy Meier, accrediting them as competent in mathematics?
You haven’t.

And this is more or less the core of your argument, everything else being just insults and foul language.

C.B. wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:54 pm

omedam777 wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:10 pm

C.B. wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 4:14 pm

And how do you know it is “for balance and precision”?

Because it is obvious

Ok 777, it is obvious. Obvious in what. If you have the intention to do math then you should show some evidence of what you claim.
Just making statements is not helpful and doesn’t mean anything.

Obviousness is evidence enough. Like I said, it is obvious, however it may be to me and not yet to you.

That being said, the Pyramid of Giza, the Golden Ratio and the Pythagorean Theorem plus the squaring of circle (perimeter to circumference) make 3.144606 obvious as they are all connected together within an intrinsic relationship (do not if I said this correctly).

3.14159265359 JUST DOESN'T CORRELATE.

Simply put... That is not math. That is pure observation an deduction based upon the law of causality with honest discernment.

Take 3.14159265359. The reason we are not able to square the circle with 3.141593 is because IT DOES NOT RELATE TO THE GOLDEN RATIO. IT DOESN'T RELATE TO THE PYRAMID. SCIENTISTS SAY 3.1416 IS TRANSCENDENTAL BUT CAN'T EVEN EXPLAIN WHY IT IS WHAT THEY CLAIM IT IS?

No one other than humans postulated that Pi 3.14159265359 was transcendental and then slapped a cryptic equation with a Latin letter of Pi and a value of 3.1415926. Yet, throughout math's history on Earth are very serious errors... And thick-headed idiots not seeing the big picture or asking redundant or questions.

Tell me C.B....WHAT ARE YOU SEEKING FOR? You can't tell ms that you want a super scientific explanation t the simplest of equations. That's ridiculous and honestly insulting.

You might as well let Hush be right on te fact that we can't agree on simple stuff. That's why we are not a lot discussing this. There's not more insight from others, and also that is why we can't advance.

Asking questions upon questions bu not exercising anything I order to get an answer for these questions.

I mean seriously... THIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MATH with a simple correction on Pi. Why are you being blind to this?

I can easily see and understand your own equation without having to ask a question about it. At first it was confusing, but I LITERALLY TESTED IT.

BOTH MY EQUATIONS AND YOURS SQUARE THE CIRCLE. WHAT ARE TRULY LOOKING FOR C.B.?

Ok... Let's do math:

C = circumference
d = diameter
r = radius
Pi = C/d or C/2r

If the diameter is 4*1/pi, then the circumference will INEVITABLY be Pi.

If you do 4/pi you get a VERY CLOSE APPROXIMATION OF SQUARE ROOT OF THE GOLDEN RATIO.

If you already know that PHI is 1+sqrt(5)/2, then one can logically deduce that Pi is truly 4/sqrt(phi).

How we know it is true? Just check the dimensions of the Pyramid of Giza with the 3.144606 and you will soon find compliance EVEN for the speed of Light... And everything else previously mentioned.

Also...

If the circumference of the Circle is Pi 3.144606, then the base perimeter of a square will be 3.144606. The height of of the Pyramid divided by 1/2 base of the Pyramid equals the square root of the Golden Ratio.

THIS CAN NEVER HAPPEN WITH 3.141593. EVER!

Also... From the Golden Ratio another Pi can be found which closely resemble 3.14159265359, namely phi^2*6/5 giving 3.141641....

If anyone wants to look that up, be my guest. It also has special properties so although all point to 3.144606, I am still exploring 3.141641, because of its similarity with 3.14159265359.

Ok.
Let’s put it simple.
Where did you find the mathematical proof that π=3.1446?

C.B. wrote: Sun Sep 14, 2025 1:10 pm Ok.
Let’s put it simple.
Where did you find the mathematical proof that π=3.1446?

Aaaah... Now you're talking.

I devised a redundancy within the equations using r = radius of the circle and s = 1/2 Side Length of a square.

The first equation maintains the correctness of the radius:

a = Sqrt((r^2/s)^2-s^2))

This equation is same as 16/pi = sqrt(16+pi^2)

It ensures that when comparing the result with the radius, the result is THE SAME as the radius.

The second equation is to ensure that the half Side Length of a square in relation with the circle remains the same, although in reality, it is not necessary because polygons have FIXED values.

b = r^2/sqrt(r^2+s^2)

From these, I used 4/sqrt(phi), knowing that r/s is the square root of the Golden Ratio:

Pi = 4/(a/b) or 4b/a

If 3.14159265359 was correct, the result would be 3.14159265359. But it is never correct as it falls around 3.13...!

Such isn't the case with 3.14460551103. The result comes out as 3.14460551103. Always.

Again im sharing a desmos equation (no graphs):

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/4serplimfk

Just slide the knob on Pi_c in order to see the truth in Pi_t.

The Golden Ratio changes depending of the inputted Pi.

From these, I used 4/sqrt(phi), knowing that r/s is the square root of the Golden Ratio:

Pi = 4/(a/b) or 4b/a

….and how do you know that r/s is the square root of the Golden Ratio?

C.B. wrote: Sun Sep 14, 2025 1:29 pm

From these, I used 4/sqrt(phi), knowing that r/s is the square root of the Golden Ratio:

Pi = 4/(a/b) or 4b/a

….and how do you know that r/s is the square root of the Golden Ratio?

You love to ask rhetorical questions. Figure that part out bro. Lol.

Make sure to click on the "Notes" folder. You will see the circumference in "action"

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/4serplimfk