Cannot arbitrarily transpose variable defined as area into length
Cannot solve for variables of area by arbitrarily assigning as leg dimensions of a right-triangle
Cannot arbitrarily assume the hypotenuse of said right-triangle is equal to 1
C.B. wrote: Sun Sep 14, 2025 7:32 pm
So, I’m getting tired of this.
Make us see what you see. Because your b=0.786151377757 is arbitrary, as if chosen out of nowhere.
For you to see what I see you should open your eyes and leave the illusion that you’re some kind of hidden genius. No offense intended.
You say as if chosen from nowhere?
Go and solve b^4+b^2-1=0
I see you b^2+b-1 and see the Golden Ratio relation in it.
Really? Then look again because you’re missing something.
The Golden Ratio is just a result of this derivation, so yes of course you can see it. No big deal.
But your equation shows b = pi/4 has 0.785398 which is not the aforementioned.
really? Why don’t you quote it right away and let’s see it?
If it has to do with a particular derivation, then you should probably educate us thoroughly on what YOU see.
Are you joking? If you can’t understand that we can represent a circle and a Square with the same perimeter and calculate their areas and use the values to find out the value of b over Pythagoras, ……fellow, it is very little that I could do for you. Except advice you to grab some geometry books.
Otherwise, this is incessant bickering versus real danger of cosmic eradication.
Cosmic Erradication? Ah I see, you’re trying to save the Planet. Good luck with it.
I'm not tired yet:
Screenshot_20250914-153541_Desmos.jpg (164.11 KiB) Viewed 1624 times
No, haven't forgot anything actually, my statements highlighting why your Pi=3.1446 proof is invalid are credible, but not my problem you don't understand the logic and real mathematics. Kind of like you getting tired of explaining to 777 why your faked Pi=3.1446 is valid, I'm just as tired trying to help you understand why your faked Pi=3.1446 pretend math proof is INVALID (LOL). It wouldn't be so bad if you could at least convince one other Pi-Radical, other than yourself, that your faked Pi=3.1446 is valid, but you can't even do that, failing entirely trying to convince both Arthur and 777. You have a long journey ahead trying to convince the world your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is valid my friend.
No need to trust my comments why your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is invalid, go visit a nearby math professor, show them your remarkable less-than-a-page faked Pi=3.1446 proof, and explain to the professor, accredited in mathematics, why you're so smart, and believe you've proven True Pi=3.1446 when no one else in history for the last 2-centuries has been able to phantom your ingenious Pi=3.1446 derivation, and then listen carefully to what the professor says, if they don't first throw you out of their office, and compare their comments to mine and you'll note a common thread. In fact your latest less than one page, derivation for Pi=3.1446 is the worse I've ever seen, so incredibly flawed with pretend math assumptions, its beyond belief and comprehension, and really highlights to what extent a human being can brainwash themselves into believing the most ridiculous concepts.
But we know you're just too chicken to go show your faked Pi=3.1446 proof to a university math professor for comment and why you prefer to hang out in here, where its safe, at home in your lazy boy rocker eating donuts, pretending you're smarter than everyone else, smarter than every mathematicians in the world, pushing that your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is credible. And how is that going by the way?
Say C.B. are you making any progress with 777 convincing them your True Pi=3.1446 less-than-a-page proof is credible? Based on your recent dialogue with 777, sounds like you're loosing your cool, getting a little frustrated that nobody understand your pretend math concepts. Well can you blame them, THEY'RE PRETEND MATH concepts that nobody understands but you. So don't get frustrated your Pi-Radical buddies don't understand your nonsense Pi=3.1446 proof, nobody understands your faked Pi=3.1446 proof obviously. Not even Arthur is onboard with your faked Pi=3.1446 proof. Are you feeling a little alone and worn-out trying to convince anyone other than yourself your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is valid?
Regardless, my plan to help you promote your faked Pi=3.1446 proof to the rest of the world is solid, but you're struggling with Step 1) convince a fellow Pi-Radical buddy your faked Pi=3.1446 if valid. Ok, so don't be so rough around the edges, play nice with your Pi-Radical buddies, and as 777 says, lead the way and slowly guide them into understanding your twisted logic why you believe your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is credible, and all you have to do is convince just ONE Pi-Radical your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is valid and then you can move onto Step 2) of my plan which is to bribe a university profession your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is valid.
So although right now your success rate convincing other Pi-Radicals your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is valid, is about 0% but keep it up C.B., don't get discouraged by the fact that no one believes your faked True Pi=3.1446 proof. Worse case scenario you can always fake another proof, but this time use more colors, it will look nicer.
Last edited by Hush on Sun Sep 14, 2025 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
G on the image is b. Substitute x for b and it is still your formula which you so blatantly call a proof.
Pal, I have no time for this. Bring something meaningful and let’s talk about it
Now I'm starting to understand why Phil Webb couldn't respect your work.
Starting to understand. Oh,! There is still hope then.
Phil Webb was not able to refute it and this has definitively upset him. So much that he gave up his channel.
You only see your work as the absolute.
Not at all. There is still another derivation which is correct. It can be seen in this thread.
You're like Anakin Skywalker about to turn into Darth Vader right before our very eyes.
Star Wars?
I didn’t see the movie.
I mean seriously? You consider your work as nonsense? You won! Lol
In the way you abuse it? Well yes. It is nonsense.
Last edited by C.B. on Sun Sep 14, 2025 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
G on the image is b. Substitute x for b and it is still your formula which you so blatantly call a proof.
Pal, I have no time for this. Bring something meaningful and let’s talk about it
Now I'm starting to understand why Phil Webb couldn't respect your work.
Starting to understand. Oh,! There is still hope then.
Phil Webb was not able to refute it and this has definitively upset him. So much that he gave up his channel.
You only see your work as the absolute.
Not at all. There is still another derivation which is correct. It can be seen in this thread.
You're like Anakin Skywalker about to turn into Darth Vader right before our very eyes.
Star Wars?
I didn’t see the movie.
I mean seriously? You consider your work as nonsense? You won! Lol
In the way you abuse it? Well yes. It is nonsense.
No, haven't forgot anything actually, my statements highlighting why your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is invalid are credible, just not my problem you don't understand real mathematics, and like you tired of trying to explain to 777 why your faked Pi=3.1446 is valid, I'm just as tired trying to help you understand why your faked Pi=3.1446 proof is INVALID (LOL).
As I told you once.
You have no shame.
Don't take my word for it, go visit a math professor, show them your remarkable less-than-a-page faked Pi=3.1446 proof and then listen carefully
Did already several times and listened carefully but there was nothing to hear..
