Can someone help me understand this statement made by Billy in CR 886?
He states that in "Iraq recently, idiotically, homosexuality has been criminalised, as it is elsewhere, and is even punishable by death, as in Saudi Arabia, in Nigeria and Somalia, then also in Persia resp. in Iran and Sudan. The death penalty also applies in the United Arab Emirates, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Mauritania and Qatar." . . . "It is completely morbidly idiotic and criminal to legislate and punish homosexuality and lesbianism – often in a religious-sectarian manner, as in countries where it is punishable by death – because homosexuality and lesbianism are innate – as I have already mentioned with regard to marriage in China. These forms of human sexuality are completely normal and natural and therefore not deviant, not reprehensible and therefore also not something that should be banned." . . . "...every form of sexuality is naturally predetermined, so that the human being – as well as every animal, creatures and every other life-form – carries all forms of sexual behaviour resp. forms of sexuality within itself naturally and exercises them in life. For example, in human beings, as in all other life-forms, the various forms of sexual behaviour are naturally given, such as the type or form of so-called heterosexuality, lesbianism, homosexuality, then bisexuality, ipsism resp. masturbation, but also zoophilia, i.e. sex with animals and other life-forms, which is very common worldwide."
The bit in bold has confused me, as Billy is saying here that sex with animals is not deviant, but "naturally given".
In Contact Report 829, however, Billy states: "Sodomy resp. zoophilia is equally a disorder of consciousness that arises in the same wise as any other form of self-provoked degeneracy." This suggests that zoophilia is deviant.
Is this an error in CR 886? If not, then how am I to understand and respectfully appreciate this predilection in some humans, which to me is disgusting?